DEEPA SHARMA
Harish Jain – Appellant
Versus
Ramprastha Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER
Deepa Sharma, Presiding Member.—This order shall dispose of the Consumer Complaints No.2089, 2090, 2091, 2092 and 2093 of 2016 since all the Complaints are against the same Opposite Parties and relate to the same project and the facts in all the cases are similar. Facts are being taken from Consumer Complaint No.2089 of 2016.
2. In brief, the facts of the case are that the Complainants had booked a flat in the project “RISE” of the Opposite Parties in RP City, Sector 37 D, Gurgaon, Haryana. The details are as under:
| Complaint No. | Date of booking | Total amount paid | Proposed date | Date of execution of Builder Buyer Agreement |
| 2089 of 2016 | 26.03.2012 | Rs.67,77,234/- | 30.09.2015 | 28.08.2012 |
| 2090 of 2016 | 09.12.2011 | Rs.62,09,154/- | 30.09.2015 | 02.11.2012 |
| 2091 of 2016 | 22.11.2011 | Rs.62,87,222/- | 30.09.2015 | 15.12.2012 |
| 2092 of 2016 | 02.04.2012 | Rs.66,20,645/- | 30.09.2015 | 14.09.2012 |
| 2093 of 2016 | 02.04.2012 | Rs.68,58,904/- | 30.09.2015 | 20.07.2012 |
3. The case of the Complainants is that the Opposite Parties had promised to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.