SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C.VISWANATH
Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
R. K. Chopra – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mr. Pravin Bahadur, Advocate with Mr. Vishnu Kant, Advocate and Mr. Bhishmadev Mund, AR

ORDER

C. Viswanath, Presiding Member—This Appeal Execution is directed against the order of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab (hereinafter referred to as “the State Commission) dated 20.04.2021 in EA-292/2020, whereby the State Commission issued non-bailable warrants against the Appellants/Judgment Debtors.

2. State Commission, vide order dated 30.03.2020 passed in CC/813/2019 directed the Opposite Parties as follows: -

1. To handover the possession of the flat No.1502, measuring 1285 sq. ft., in addition, complete in all respects along with all the amenities as per the allotment letter, Ext.C-1, subject to the balance sale consideration, without interest and penalty and after obtaining the completion certificate/occupation certified issued by the competent authorities.

2. To pay compensation of Rs.5/- per sq. per month as per clause 40 (g), on the booked built up area from the stipulated date of possession i.e. 05.06.2019 till handing over the possession as per relief (i).

3. To pay Rs.55,000/- as compensation on account of mental agony and harassment as well as litigation expenses.”

3. Since the Opposite Parties failed to comply the order dated 30.03.2020

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top