SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ANUP K.THAKUR
Interglobe Aviation Limited – Appellant
Versus
Somasundaran Vazhiyodan – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Ms. Harshita Chauhan, Advocate

ORDER

Anup K. Thakur, Presiding Member.—Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner requested that the petitioner be allowed to file an amended revision petition in order that certain screenshots may be placed on record which support this revision petition. She submits that these screenshots have been placed before the lower fora but were missed out in this revision petition.

2. Before this request could be considered, learned counsel was asked to explain the delay of 464 days, as per computation made by the Registry, in filing of this revision petition. She submitted that the delay was totally on account of the previous counsel who had failed to communicate the impugned order of the State Commission to the petitioner/OP.

3. I.A. No.1618 of 2021 is an application that has been filed with this revision petition seeking condonation of delay. In this revision petition that the delay has been shown to be only 19 days. As already noted, in fact, the delay is of the order of 464 days. To understand how the delay claimed is of only 19 days, Para 3 to para 6 of the condonation application are reproduced below:

“3. That the Petitioner has learnt of the dismissal of Appeal only on 03.10.2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top