SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C.VISWANATH
Raja J. Vaghani – Appellant
Versus
Raj Developers – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Bharat Sood, Advocate with Ms. Shruti Jose, Advocate

ORDER

C. Viswanath, Presiding Member.—The present Appeal is filed against the order dated 10.05.2013 in CC No. RBT/CC/12/96 in CC No. 10/80 passed by Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai (for short “State Commission”).

2. Along with the Appeal, IA/2240/2014, an application for condonation of delay has also been filed by the Appellant. The Registry of this Commission has calculated the delay of 149 days. As per the

3. Appellant executed a Flat Buyer Agreement dated 1.10.1996 with the Opposite Party for sale of Flat No.602,’B’-Wing, Regency park, Amrit Shakti, Chandivali, Powai, Mumbai. Total sale consideration of Rs.3,31,500/- was to be paid in instalments. As per clause-9 of the Agreement, the Opposite Party/Respondent agreed to complete construction of the building and hand over possession of the Flat on or before 1st March, 1998. The Complainant regularly made payments as per demands from the Opposite Party. Possession of the Flat was offered, vide letter dated 19.12.2007. Since the price of immovable property in Mumbai suddenly shot up after 1995-96 by 10 to 15 times more than the original price, the Opposite Party started demanding and pressurising t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top