SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

C.VISWANATH
Dara Estates Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Manbir Kaur – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mr. Jalaj Agarwal, Advocate

ORDER

C. Viswanath, Presiding Member.—This Appeal Execution is directed against the order of Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as “the State Commission) dated 26.02.2021 in Execution Application No.88 of 2020 in Consumer Complaint No.804 of 2018, whereby the State Commission issued fresh non-bailable warrants against the Appellants/Judgment Debtors.

2. State Commission, vide order dated 15.07.2019, passed in CC/804/2018 directed the Appellants/Opposite Parties to refund the amount of Rs.7,00,000/- to the Complainants with 12% interest alongwith cost of Rs.15,000/- as compensation for harassment and mental agony. Since the Appellants/Opposite Parties failed to comply with the order dated 15.07.2019, the Complainants/Decree Holders filed Execution Petition before the State Commission. In the Execution Petition, on 26.02.2021, the State Commission passed the following order: -

“As per report of the Registry, power of attorney has not been filed by learned counsel for JD No.2. Be filed in the Registry on or before the adjourned date.

As per report of the Registry, correct address of JD No.1 has not been filed by the DH. Be file

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top