SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DINESH SINGH
Amit Kumar Ruhela – Appellant
Versus
Sun Eye Hospital & Lasik Surgery Center – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Nikhil Jain, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Pawan Kumar Ray, Advocate

ORDER

Dinesh Singh, Presiding Member.—These Revision Petitions have been filed in challenge to the Order dated 25.11.2019 of The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Uttar Pradesh (the ‘State Commission’) in First Appeal No. 927 of 2017 and First Appeal No. 935 of 2017 arising out of the Order dated 21.04.2017 in C.C. No. 175 of 2013 passed by The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, II-Lucknow (the ‘District Forum’).

The Petitioners No. 1 and No. 2 in R.P. No. 350 of 2020, Dr. Sudhir Srivastava and Sun Eye Hospital & Lasik Laser Center, were the Opposite Parties before the District Forum.

The Petitioner in R.P. No. 861 of 2020, Mr. Amit Kumar Ruhela, was the Complainant before the District Forum.

Dr. Sudhir Srivastava is hereinafter being referred to as the ‘Doctor’, Sun Eye Hospital & Lasik Laser Center as the ‘Hospital’ and Mr. Amit Kumar Ruhela as the ‘Complainant’.

R.P. No. 350 of 2020 has been filed by the Doctor and the Hospital for setting aside the Order dated 25.11.2019 of the State Commission.

R.P. No. 861 of 2020 has been filed by the Complainant for enhancement in compensation.

2. Heard arguments from Mr. Pawan Kumar Ray, learned Counsel for the Doctor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top