R.K.AGRAWAL, S.M.KANTIKAR
Eldho David – Appellant
Versus
Denny P. Kuttikkat – Respondent
ORDER
Dr. S.M. Kantikar, Member.—The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Complainant/Petitioner (Eldho David) under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the impugned Order wherein the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Vazhuthacaud, Thiruvananthapuram (hereinafter referred to as the “State Commission”) allowed the appeal and set aside the Order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ernakulam (hereinafter referred to as the “District Forum”) in Consumer Complaint No. 250 of 2010.
2. Brief facts of the case are that on 22.02.2010 the Complainant’s daughter (hereinafter referred to as the “patient”) was taken to the casualty at Carmel Hospital, Aluva (hereinafter referred to as the “Opposite Party No. 2”) for severe abdominal pain. It was diagnosed as acute appendicitis and advised immediate surgery. On 23.02.2010, Dr. Denny P. Kuttikkat (hereinafter referred to as the “Opposite Party No. 1”) performed laparoscopic appendectomy and after two days the patient was discharged. The patient continued taking medicines but there was no relief from pain. On 26.02.2010, again she was taken to the Opposite Party No. 2 Hospital and on 29.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.