Gauri Grih Nirman Sahakari Maryadit VS Pankaj Chouhan

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

C.VISWANATH
Gauri Grih Nirman Sahakari Maryadit – Appellant
Versus
Pankaj Chouhan – Respondent

Counsel for the Parties:
In all the four RPs:
For the Petitioner:Mr. G. Umapathy, Advocate, Mr. Rohit K. Singh, Advocate with Ms. Pavitra Balakrishnan
In R.P. Nos.104, 105 & 2914/2011:
For the Respondent:Mr. G.S. Chaturvedi, Advocate
In R.P. No.106/2011:
For the Respondent:Mr. Soumyajit Pani and Mr. Ranjan Kumar, Advocates

JUDGMENT

C. Viswanath, Presiding Member.—Revision Petition Nos.104 to 106 of 2011 have been filed against common the order dated 05.10.2020 in First Appeal Nos.730, 731 & 1017 of 2008 and Revision Petition No.2914 of 2011 has been filed against the order dated 15.07.2011 passed in First Appeal No.1075 of 2011 of the Madhya Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bhopal (in short, “the State Commission”) whereby First Appeal Nos.730, 731 & 1017 of 2008 were dismissed on merit and First Appeal No.1075 of 2011 was dismissed as barred by limitation.

2. Case of the Complainants/Respondents is that the Petitioner was a Co-Operative Housing Society and the Respondents/Complainants were its Members. Complainant Pankaj Chouhan was allotted Plot No.A-58 of 1500 sq. ft. for a sum of Rs.22,500/-, vide sale deed dated 06.05.1994. Neeraj Chouhan was allotted Plot No.A-59 of 1500 sq. ft. for a sum of Rs.22,500/-, vide sale deed dated 10.06.1994. Sunita Modi was allotted Plot No.A-60 of 1500 sq. ft., vide sale deed dated 31.12.1993. P.N. Ahirwar was allotted Plot No.A-11 of 35 x 60 sq. ft. for a sum of Rs.31,500/-, vide sale deed dated 26.05.1993. Original site plan was also annexed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

C.VISWANATHGauri Grih Nirman Sahakari Maryadit – AppellantVersusPankaj Chouhan – Respondent

Cases Referred (2)

C.VISWANATH
Gauri Grih Nirman Sahakari Maryadit – Appellant
Versus
Pankaj Chouhan – Respondent