SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI, PADMA PANDEY, RAJESH K.ARYA
Bhavna Sobat Trikha – Appellant
Versus
Greater Mohali Area Development Authority – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
Present through video conferencing:
For the Complainant:Sh. Sandeep Bhardwaj, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:Sh. Anuj Kohli, Advocate

ORDER

Raj Shekhar Attri, President—Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (in short the GMADA), is a Statutory Authority, which planned to develop a project named ECO City, Phase-II, New Chandigarh, Punjab and sell the plots/units therein to the general public and undertook to complete the development work in the stipulated period but it failed to do so. As such, the GMADA can also be held liable for deficiency in providing service to the complainant and other prospective buyers, who have invested in the said project, in view of principle of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Lucknow Development Authority Vs. M.K.Gupta, Civil Appeal No.6237 of 1990, decided on 5.11.1993, wherein it was held that when a statutory authority undertakes to construct building or allot houses or building sites to citizens of the State either as amenity or as benefit then it amounts to rendering of service and will be covered in the expression ‘service made available to potential users’ .

1. Instant complaint has been filed under section 47 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top