Vikas Setia VS Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, ANIL SRIVASTAVA
Vikas Setia – Appellant
Versus
Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant: In person
For the Opposite Party.: Mr. Tanuj Sharma, Counsel

JUDGMENT

[Via Video Conferencing]

Dr. Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, President —Brief facts necessary for the adjudication of the present complaint are that on 11.08.2007, the Complainant booked a plot with the Opposite Party and paid a sum of Rs. 1,57,000/- as the booking amount.

2. The Opposite Party allotted plot bearing No. C-2118, admeasuring 250 sq. mtr. in Opposite party’s project namely “Sushant City”, located at Kurukshetra, Haryana. The basic sale price as agreed between the parties was Rs. 6,279/- per Sq. Mtr. along with an additional cost of Rs. 37,375/- as Preferential Location Charges and Rs. 2,84,050 as External Development Charges. The total sale consideration amounts to Rs.18,91,175/-.

3. Thereafter, the Plot Buying Agreement was executed between the parties on 03.09.2007 which consists of the payment plan as opted by the complainant to meet its liability towards the Opposite Party. For ready reference the payment plan has been reproduced as follows:

Development Linked Payment Plan Installments	% Of Basic Sale Price Due	Amount Due
With application of Allotm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, ANIL SRIVASTAVAVikas Setia – AppellantVersusAnsal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, ANIL SRIVASTAVA
Vikas Setia – Appellant
Versus
Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. – Respondent