DINESH SINGH
Taken up through video conferencing M/s. Jagdamba Enterprises (SSI) – Appellant
Versus
Canara Bank – Respondent
ORDER
Dinesh Singh, Presiding Member.—This Revision Petition has been filed under Section 21(b) of The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (‘Act 1986’) in challenge to the Order dated 14.02.2011 of The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bihar (‘State Commission’) in F.A. No. 131 of 2009 arising out of the Order dated 26.03.2009 in C.C. No. 01 of 2005 passed by The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Sitamarhi (‘District Commission’).
2. Heard learned Counsel for the Revisionist Complainant Firm, learned Counsel for the Respondents No. 1 to No. 4 Bank and learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 5 Insurance Co.
Perused the material on record, including inter alia the Order dated 26.03.2009 of the District Commission, the impugned Order dated 14.02.2011 of the State Commission and the Petition.
3. The dispute relates to repudiation of an insurance claim.
4. The factual matrix of the matter has been succinctly captured by the State Commission in paras 3 and 4 of its Order of 14.02.2011:
“3. The complaint was filed by the complainant alleging therein that he had mortgaged his property for obtaining loan from Canara Bank, Sitamarhi Branch, which was sanctioned in two i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.