ORDER

Deepa Sharma, Presiding Member.—The Petitioners have challenged in the present Revision Petition, the order dated 08.12.2020 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (for short “the State Commission”) in Appeal No.140 of 2020.

2. The chronology of the events is that the Respondent/Complainant had filed a Complaint No.55 of 2018 before the District Forum. Vide Order dated 10.09.2019, the District Forum allowed the Complaint. The Petitioners thereafter filed an Appeal No.140 of 2020 against the order of the District Forum. Since this Appeal had been filed with a delay of 367 days, the Petitioners had also filed, along with their Appeal, a miscellaneous application no.748 of 2020 seeking condonation of delay of 367 days.

3. Vide the impugned order the said application of the Petitioners was dismissed. Aggrieved by the dismissal of the application and dismissal of the Appeal, the present Revision Petition has been filed.

4. It is argued by learned Counsel for the Petitioners that they have a good case on merit and the State Commission has committed illegality and perversity and has acted in non-judicial manner, while dismissing their Appeal on merit. It is further argu