SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C.VISWANATH
Centurion Bank of Punjab (Now HDFC Bank Ltd. ) – Appellant
Versus
Balvir Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Rishab Raj Jain, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advocate

ORDER

C. Viswanath, Presiding Member.—The present Revision Petition, under Section 21(1)(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 has been filed by the Petitioner against the order dated 31.5.2013 of the Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as the “State Commission”) in Appeal No. 1799 of 2009.

2. Along with the Revision Petition, IA/3845/2014, an application for condonation of delay of 45 days has also been filed by the Petitioner. The Registry of this Commission has calculated the delay of 48 days. As per the

3. The case of the Complainant is that he opened two accounts with the Petitioner Bank, NRE Account No.121801000025364 and NRO-SB Account No.121801000040910 on 27.3.2008 and 11.3.2008 respectively. The Respondent / Complainant deposited an amount of Rs.13.50 lakhs on 6.3.2008 but the amount had not been credited in any of his accounts. The Petitioner Bank had misappropriated the said amount due to which the Complainant suffered mental harassment and therefore was entitled to compensation. A Complaint was filed before the District Forum with the prayer that the Opposite Party be directed to credit an amount of Rs.13,50,000/- in the accou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top