SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C.VISWANATH
Bhaskar A. Sawant – Appellant
Versus
Navratan Nahata – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. N.K. Chauhan, Advocate

ORDER

C. Viswanath, Presiding Member.—This Appeal Execution is directed against the interim order of Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as “the State Commission) dated 05.03.2020 in MA/07/2020, whereby the State Commission took cognigence under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act and summoned the Appellant through bailable warrants of Rs.50,000/-.

2. Alongwith the Appeal, IA/2232/2021, an application for condonation of delay 131 has been filed by the Appellant. However, according to the Registry, there is a delay of 335 days. For the reasons stated in the application and in view of the orders of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No.03 of 2020, IA is allowed and delay condoned.

3. State Commission, vide order dated 23.08.2018 passed in CC/149/2015 observed as follows: -

“Therefore, complaint of the Complainant is allowed and directed that

1. Complainant’s registration, which was cancelled on 18.12.2014, is cancelled;

2. The Complainant be allotted house, as per merit of year 1982, on the rules, under which house to junior allottees have been allotted;

3. The Opposite Party shall pay to the C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top