ORDER

Heard Mr. Yogesh Kanna, Advocate, for the petitioners and Mr. Simarjit Singh, the respondent, in person, through video conferencing and examined the written submission filed by them and the record of the case.

2. This revision has been filed against the order of State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Punjab, Chandigarh, dated 26.10.2018, passed in Appeal No. 11 of 2009, (renumbered as Special Consumer Complaint No. 344 of 2008), (arising out of the order of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Sangrur, dated 04.12.2008, passed in Consumer Complaint No. 344 of 2008), whereby District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, has dismissed the complaint and the appeal of Simarjit Singh, filed from the aforesaid order, has been treated/converted as the original complaint before State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, registered as Special Consumer Complaint No. 344 of 2008 and allowed. The petitioners have been directed to pay Rs.10,80,000/- as deprecated value of the vehicle, Rs.20,00,000/- as the value of timber loaded in it on the date of taking possession, Rs.3000/- per month from 05.07.2008 till actual payment to the respondent, by way of damages. Apart from abov