ORDER

Taken up through video conferencing.

The dispute relates to not supplying a new Machine, for which the consideration was partly paid and partly promised.

The Complaint was filed on 07.02.2003 before The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kanpur Nagar (‘District Commission’).

The Complainant was Dr. (Smt.) Vineeta Kochar, the buyer.

The Opposite Party No. 1, M/s S.S. Medical Systems, was the authorized dealer of the Opposite Party No. 2, M/s Hewlett Packard India Limited, the sellers.

The District Commission allowed the Complaint vide its Order dated 07.08.2003. Appeal there against was filed by M/s S.S. Medical Systems.

M/s Hewlett Packard India Limited did not agitate the Order of the District Commission.

The Appeal was dismissed by The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Uttar Pradesh (‘State Commission’) vide its Order dated 08.07.2008.

This Petition has been filed by M/s S.S. Medical Systems in challenge to the Order of the State Commission, invoking the revisional jurisdiction of this Commission under Section 21(1)(b) of The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (‘Act 1986’).

The sole Respondent is Dr. (Smt.) Vineeta Kochar.

M/s Hewlett Packard India Limi