ORDER

R.K. Agrawal, President—The Revision Petition No.1103 of 2010, under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”), was filed by the Petitioner/Complainant challenging the order dated 30.11.2009, passed by the Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at Jaipur (for short “the State Commission”) in Appeal No. 844/2006 where by the order of the District Forum allowing the complaint was set aside and Appeal filed by the Respondent, Haryana Urban Development Authority (for short, the HUDA) was allowed. Vide order dated 10.01.2020, this Commission while setting aside the order of the State Commission, remanded the matter to it to decide afresh.

2. Succinctly put, the material facts of the case are that the Petitioner/Complainant purchased a plot from one Mr. Raj Kumar, allottee of a plot by the HUDA and the necessary endorsement was made in favour of the Complainant by the HUDA in their record. However, due to financial constraint, Complainant requested for refund of the amount deposited with HUDA. Accordingly, HUDA refunded the deposited amount of ¹ 5,34,990/- after deducting 10% of the total cost of the Plot. Complainant requested the HUDA