SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

R.K.AGRAWAL
Mamta Aggarwal – Appellant
Versus
HUDA – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Yogesh Chauhan, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Alok Sangwan, Advocate

ORDER

The Revision Petition No. 878 of 2011, under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”), was preferred by the Petitioner, against the Impugned Order dated 08.12.2010, passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana, Panchkula (for short “the State Commission”) in First Appeal No. 490/2005 whereby the State Commission had allowed the Appeal filed by the Respondents, Haryana Urban Development Authority (for short, the HUDA) while setting aside the Order dated 16.02.2005 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Faridabad (for short “the District Forum”).

2. Succinctly put, the material facts are that on 18.11.1998 the Respondents/HUDA had allotted a residential unit being Plot No. 406 in Sector 2, Faridabad, admeasuring 14 Marlas to the Petitioner. In view of the contractual terms of the allotment letter, the possession of the Plot was supposed to be handed over within three years from the date of Allotment. The Petitioner alleged that the Respondents failed to handover the possession and instead started demanding huge enhancements towards the price of the Plot. Feeling aggrieved, on 02.05.2002 Petitioner sought

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top