R.K.AGRAWAL
Mamta Aggarwal – Appellant
Versus
HUDA – Respondent
ORDER
The Revision Petition No. 878 of 2011, under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”), was preferred by the Petitioner, against the Impugned Order dated 08.12.2010, passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana, Panchkula (for short “the State Commission”) in First Appeal No. 490/2005 whereby the State Commission had allowed the Appeal filed by the Respondents, Haryana Urban Development Authority (for short, the HUDA) while setting aside the Order dated 16.02.2005 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Faridabad (for short “the District Forum”).
2. Succinctly put, the material facts are that on 18.11.1998 the Respondents/HUDA had allotted a residential unit being Plot No. 406 in Sector 2, Faridabad, admeasuring 14 Marlas to the Petitioner. In view of the contractual terms of the allotment letter, the possession of the Plot was supposed to be handed over within three years from the date of Allotment. The Petitioner alleged that the Respondents failed to handover the possession and instead started demanding huge enhancements towards the price of the Plot. Feeling aggrieved, on 02.05.2002 Petitioner sought
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.