R.K.AGRAWAL, S.M.KANTIKAR
Manish Vashishth – Appellant
Versus
HUDA – Respondent
ORDER
R.K. Agrawal, President—The Revision Petition No. 2046 of 2011, under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”), was preferred by the Petitioners/Complainants, against the Order dated 17.01.2011, passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana, Panchkula (for short “the State Commission”) in First Appeal No. 1418/2005 whereby the State Commission had allowed the Appeal filed by the Respondents, Haryana Urban Development Authority (for short, the HUDA) and set aside the order dated 06.06.2005 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Faridabad (for short “the District Forum”).
2. Succinctly put, the material facts relevant for disposal of the Miscellaneous Application No. 239 of 2020 and I. A. No. 58 of 2021 are that on 08.03.1973, the HUDA had allotted a residential unit being Plot No. 619 admeasuring 500 sq. yards in Sector 21-B, Faridabad to one, Mrs. Parkash Kumar for a tentative price of ¹ 22,000/-. On death of the original allottee, the Plot was transferred in the name of her husband, Raj Kumar on 21.12.2003. Subsequently, the Plot was transferred by the HUDA in the name of the Complainants on 19.04.2005
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.