SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DINESH SINGH, KARUNA NAND BAJPAYEE
Taken up through video conferencing Ligare Aviation Limited – Appellant
Versus
Oriental Insurance Company Limited – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. Somesh Arora, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:Mr. Amandeep Singh, Advocate

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel present.

Perused the material on record.

1. This complaint has been filed under Section 58 read with Section 59 and further read with Section 2(5) of The Consumer Protection Act 2019 (the ‘Act 2019’).

2. Learned counsel for the opposite party insurance co. draws attention to para 27 of the complaint as well as to para 10 of the subject insurance policy document as also to Section 58(1)(a)(i) of the Act 2019, and submits that this complaint does not come under the pecuniary jurisdiction of this Commission.

3. For ready reference, the following are reproduced:

Para 27 of the Complaint:

27. That this Hon’ble Commission has pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain this Consumer complaint as the value of the goods or services paid as consideration exceeds Rs.10,00,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Crores Only).

Para 10 of the subject Insurance Policy:

10. Premium:

It is understood and agreed that the annual premium amounting to INR.28,08,000/- + 12.36% S. Tax of INR.3,47,069/- = INR.31,55,069/- (for aircraft indicated in the schedule) shall be paid in the four quarterl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top