SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C.VISWANATH, RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA
Tanu Constructions Colonizers & Developers – Appellant
Versus
Arvind Kumar Mandal – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. H. Chandra Sekhar, Advocate

ORDER

Heard Mr. H. Chandra Sekhar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

2. This revision has been filed against the order of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, dated 26.10.2020, passed in Appeal No. 20/300 of 2020 (arising out of the order of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Durg, dated 09.07.2020, passed in Consumer Complaint No. 18/848 of 2018), whereby District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Durg has allowed the complaint and directed the petitioner to pay an amount of Rs.10,85,000/- along with interest @ 9% per annum from 19.06.2015 till its payment, Rs.1,00,000/- towards mental agony of the complainant and Rs.1000/- as cost and the appeal of the petitioner, filed from the aforesaid order, has been dismissed.

3. The office has reported that the revision has been filed with delay of 12 days. In view of pandemic Covid-19, in the country and imposition of lock-down, the delay in filing of the revision is condoned.

4. Arvind Kumar Mandal (the respondent) filed a consumer complaint (registered as Consumer Complaint No. 18/848 of 2018), before District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Durg, against Tannu Constructions, Colonizers & Developers (t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top