SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C.VISWANATH
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Pankaj Sood – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Mohan Babu Agarwal, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate

ORDER

The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner against order dated 01/07/2013 passed by Chhattishgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Raipur (for short “State Commission”) in First Appeal No.13/110.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the Complainant was owner of Toyota Corola bearing No.C.G.-04-CZ- 1555. The Complainant had obtained Insurance coverage from the Opposite Party under Policy No.191300/31/2010/8124 for the period from 24.01.2010 to 23.01.2011. The vehicle of the Complainant was used as taxi and it was attached to Hotel Babylon. On receiving a call from the Hotel on 19.05.2010, driver Mr. Mukesh Kumar had taken the vehicle to the Hotel. The car was used by the customer by name Kamlesh. On the next day the vehicle was called again and the driver took the vehicle to the Hotel. He took the vehicle to Nagpur and from there he sent the driver to Mumbai by air, for bringing some important draft. He also made arrangements for stay of the driver at a hotel. Mukesh Kumar reached the hotel and waited for the person from whom the draft was to be collected, but nobody turned up. He tried to contact Mr. Kamlesh but his mobile was switched off. There

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top