ORDER

Heard Ms. Reena Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner and Preet Kamal Singh, contesting respondent-1, in person, through video conferencing and examined the written submission filed by them and the record of the case.

2. This revision has been filed against the order of State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, U.T. Chandigarh, dated 16.12.2019, passed in Appeal No. 130 of 2019 (arising out of the order of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-II, U.T. Chandigarh, dated 02.05.2019, passed in Consumer Complaint No. 544 of 2018), whereby District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum II, has allowed the complaint and directed M/s Videocon Industries Ltd. to pay an amount of Rs.33,014/- as the costs of DDB LED, Rs.10,000/- as compensation for harassment and Rs. 7,000/ as cost of litigation to the complainant, within a period of 30 days and the appeal of M/S Videocon Industries limited, filed from the aforesaid order, has been dismissed.

3. Preet Kamal Singh (respondent-1) filed Consumer Complaint No. 544 of 2018, against Videocon Industries Limited, Videocon d2h Limited and Pinky Electronics, for refund of Rs.33014/- as the price of DDB LED along with interest @ 19% p.a. from