SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C.VISWANATH, RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA
Ram Kishore Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Gupta – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Nishant Kishore, Advocate
For the Respondents: Nemo

ORDER

The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner against the order dated 10.07.2017 of Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Patna (for short “the State Commission”) in First Appeal No.66/2016, whereby the Appeal filed by the Petitioner was dismissed.

2. Alongwith the Revision Petition, IA/7967/2018, an application for condonation of delay has also been filed by the Petitioner. According to the Petitioner, there is a delay of 158 days in filing the Revision Petition. However, according to the computation done by the Registry, there is a delay of 313 days.

3. Heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner on IA/7967/2018, application for condonation of delay and also carefully perused the record.

4. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the Petitioner is a resident of Patna and it took considerable time to obtain all documents and the impugned order from the State Commission and contact the advocate at Delhi. Petitioner personally visited Delhi twice to sign and verify the Revision Petition, which also took time. Petitioner being very old and partially disabled, took time to visit Delhi for signing the necessary papers. It was further submitte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top