SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C.VISWANATH, RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA
Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Nikil Patra – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Varun Dev Mishra, Advocate
For the Respondent No.1:Mr. Anjan Sinha, Advocate

ORDER

Heard Mr. Varun Dev Mishra, Advocate, for the petitioner and Mr. Anjan Sinha, Advocate, for respondent-1.

2. This revision has been filed against the order of State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, West Bengal, dated 16.03.2020, passed in First Appeal No. 5 of 2018, (arising out of the order of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Hoogly, dated 25.10.2017, passed in Consumer Complaint No. 182 of 2014), whereby District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, has allowed the complaint, directed the petitioner to return the tractor to the complainant with all accessories in good condition, to pay Rs.5,00,000/- towards compensation and Rs.10,000/- as the cost and the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed.

3. The office has reported that the revision has been filed with delay of 296 days. Supreme Court in Suo Moto Writ Petition (C) No. 3 of 2020, by orders dated 23.03.2020, 08.03.2021 and 27.04.2021, has directed to exclude the limitation after 15.03.2020. As such the delay in filing the revision is condoned.

4. Nikhil Patra (respondent-1) filed Consumer Complaint No. 182 of 2014, against Shriram Transport Finance Company Limited, (the petitioner) (hereinafter

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top