SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DEEPA SHARMA, SUBHASH CHANDRA
Kerala Cars Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Vishal S. Patel – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Devvrat and Ms. Swati Setia, Advocates

ORDER

Subhash Chandra, Member.—The present Revision Petition, under Section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”) has been filed by the Petitioner against order dated 21.08.2018 of the Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (for short “State Commission”) in First Appeal No. 496/2016 wherein the Appeal filed by the Petitioner was dismissed.

2. Case of the Complainant/Respondent No. 1 is that he booked a Ford Eco Sport 1.0 Titanium petrol car on 01.08.2013, through the Petitioner/Opposite Party No. 2 M/s Kerala Cars (P) Ltd. and paid a booking amount of Rs. 50,000/-. After three months, the Complainant was informed that there had been a delay in procuring the car that the Complainant had booked and as a result the Complainant was made to book a different model. Accordingly, the OP issued a fresh quotation for the new model so as to enable the complainant to get a loan sanctioned for the vehicle. The bank agreed to pay an amount of Rs. 6,00,000/- as a loan to the Complainant and accordingly the amount was remitted to Petitioner by the bank. The Complainant was thereafter informed that the car he had booked was ready for delivery and was provide

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top