DINESH SINGH, KARUNA NAND BAJPAYEE
Taken up through video conferencing Damodar Valley Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Hi Tech (Cements) Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER
Heard the learned senior counsel / learned counsel for the two sides. Perused the material on record.
2. This revision petition has been preferred under Section 21(b) of the Act 1986 (corresponding Section 58(1)(b) of the Act 2019), impugning the Order dated 10.03.2021 of the State Commission in I.A. No. 135 of 2021 in F.A. No. 371 of 2013. The said Order reads as below:
Order No. 21
Heard the Ld. Advocate for the Appellant regarding IA/135/2021. None appears on behalf of Respondent. Perused the order dated 04.01.2019 as well as letter dated 24.02.2021 of Ld. Advocate of Respondent.
In view of the observation made in earlier order disconnection notice dated 28.01.2021 be stayed till disposal of the Appeal. Barring disputed arrear bills, current electricity bills be paid in regular course.
Thus, IA is disposed of. To date for hearing.
The appeal is pending adjudication before the State Commission since 2013; the interim Order of the State Commission, impugned herein, has been passed in 2021.
It is germane to note that the ideal normative period for disposing of an appeal is 90 days of its admission [Section 19A of the Act 1986 (corresponding Section 52 of the Act 2019)].
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.