SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

C.VISWANATH, RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA
Secretary, Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti – Appellant
Versus
Anu Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Vishal Meghwal, Advocate

ORDER

Heard Mr. Vishal Meghwal, Advocate for the petitioner.

2. This revision petition has been filed against the order of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajasthan dated 01.11.2019 passed in First Appeal No.1040 of 2019 (arising out of the order of District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum, Jhunjhunu dated 21.08.2019 passed in Complaint Case No.285 of 2016), whereby District Forum, has allowed the complaint and directed the petitioner to pay Rs.2 Lakhs under Rajeev Gandhi Krishak Sathi Yojna to the complainant who is widow of Ram Ji Lal along with interest at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from 21.06.2016 till the date of payment, Rs.30,000/- for mental agony and Rs.3,300/- as cost of litigation.

3. Anu Devi, the complainant filed a consumer complaint No.285 of 2016 claiming Rs.2 Lakhs under Rajiv Gandhi Krishak Sathi Yojna along with interest at the rate of 8 per cent per annum and Rs.30,000/- for mental agony and Rs.3,300/- as cost of litigation. It has been alleged in the complaint that Ram Ji Lal, her husband, was working in his field as an agriculturist. He died on 16.09.2015 due to electric shock in his field, which was flowing in the wire connected to the el

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top