SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA
Akhilesh Kumar Naithani – Appellant
Versus
M3M India Private Limited – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainants:Mr. Aditya Parolia, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:Mr. A.R. Takkar, Advocate

ORDER

Ram Surat Ram Maurya, Presiding Member.—Heard Mr. Aditya Parolia, Advocate, for the complainants and Mr. A.R. Takkar, Advocate, for the opposite party, through video conferencing.

2. Akhilesh Kumar Naithani and Smt. Kusum Naithani (the complainants) have filed this complaint for directing M3M India Private Limited (opposite-party), (hereinafter referred to as the builder) (i) to give physical possession of Unit-1 to the complainants, complete in all respects and in conformity with agreement-1 and execute all necessary and required documents in respect of Unit-1, in favour of the complainants; (ii) to waive off delayed penalty charges imposed on the complainants by the opposite party, at interest rate of 24% per annum with respect to Unit No. 1; (iii) to hand over possession of Unit-2 and Unit-3 to the complainants, complete in all respects and in conformity with agreement-2 and agreement-3 respectively and execute all necessary and required documents in respect of said Unit-2 and Unit-3, in favour of the complainants within a period of 6 months, from the date of filing of this complaint; (iv) to pay interest @ 12% per annum, on the amount deposited by the complainants with th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top