SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA
Rajan Handa – Appellant
Versus
M3M India Developers Limited – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. A.R. Takkar, Advocate

ORDER

IA/18672/2017, IA/7681/2018, IA/12704/2018, IA/9106/2019 & IA/5724/2020, For the reasons stated in the applications, IAs are allowed.

JUDGMENT

Ram Surat Ram Maurya, Presiding Member.—Heard Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate, for the complainant and Mr. A.R. Takkar, Advocate, for the opposite parties, through video conferencing.

2. Sh. Rajan Handa (the complainant) has filed this complaint for directing M3M India Private Limited and another (opposite-parties), (hereinafter referred to as the builder) (i) to refund the entire amount of Rs.46,36,730/- along with interest @ 24% per annum w.e.f. 14.05.2012 till the date of actual refund as deposited by him; (ii) to pay compensation of Rs.20,00,000/-, for mental trauma, harassment and hardship caused to the complainant; (iii) to pay Rs.1,00,000/- to the complainants as the cost of litigation and (iv) any other relief which the Commission deems fit and proper, in the fact and circumstances of the case, be passed.

3. The facts as stated in the complaint are that the builder was a company, engaged in the business of development and cons

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top