SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PARAMJEET SINGH DHALIWAL, RAJINDER KUMAR GOYAL
Kanika Gupta – Appellant
Versus
New India Assurance Company Limited – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the complainant :Sh. Sachin Ohri, Advocate
For the opposite party :Sh.Vinod Gupta, Advocate

ORDER

Paramjeet Singh Dhaliwal, President:—Earlier this complaint was allowed exparte by this Commission, vide order dated 05.12.2019. The opposite party challenged that order before the Hon’ble National Commission by way of filing First Appeal No.246 of 2020; which was partly allowed vide order dated 27.11.2020, which reads as follows:-

“6. Based on the above discussion, we partly allow the appeal no.246 of 2020 and the insurance company is first directed to pay Rs.13,50,754/- to the complainant. Learned counsel for the insurance company states that this amount of Rs.13,50,754/- was already deposited by them with the State Commission and this amount along with accrued interest may be released to the complainant. Accordingly, the State Commission is directed to release the amount of Rs.13,50,754/- along with accrued interest to the complainant within a period of 30 days. Further, the complainant is praying that report of the surveyor is not correct and that the complainant is entitled to the total IDV and this is a case of constructive total loss. As the insurance company has n

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top