SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

D.P.CHOUDHURY
Director of Xavier Institute of Management & Enterpreneurship – Appellant
Versus
Sujay Ghose – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant No. 1:M/s. R.K. Pattnaik & Assoc., Advocate
For the Respondent – Respondent in person present.

FINAL ORDER / JUDGMENT

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and respondent in person on V.C.

2. This appeal is filed U/S-15 of erstwhile Consumer Protection Act,1986(herein-after called the Act). Hereinafter, the parties to this appeal shall be referred to with reference to their respective status before the learned District Forum.

3. The factual matrix leading to the case of the complainant is that the complainant got his admission in OP-Institute on 15.06.2015 to prosecute to PGDM programme course. The complainant alleged inter-alia that he has deposited fees of Rs.3,10,000/- with OP under latter’s institution in shape of Demand Draft to take admission and obtained receipt thereof. After taking admission the complainant alleged about the unhygienic water and spices food served in hostel of institution for which the complainant became seriously ill. He came back to his home at Puri and got himself treated there and at Bhubaneswar. The doctor diagonised him suffering from chronic colitis due to such food and water supply while he was living in hostel of OP-institution.

4. It is alleged that the health condition of the complainant did not improve, he has to discontin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top