SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI, PADMA PANDEY, RAJESH K.ARYA
Amit Chhokra – Appellant
Versus
DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Sh.Narender Yadav, Advocate
For the Opposite Parties :Sh.Kunal Dawar, Advocate

ORDER

Padma Pandey, Member— In brief, the facts of the case, are that the Opposite Parties developed a residential Group Housing Project under the name and style of “The Valley” situated in Sector 3, Kalka – Pinjore Urban Complex. Initially Sh.Alok Kumar Roy booked a flat in the project of the Opposite Parties on 30.03.2010 and paid amount of Rs. 6 lakhs. He also entered into Independent Floor Buyer’s Agreement dated 01.12.2010 (Annexure C-1) with the Opposite Parties, whereby, a unit bearing No.C-3/45 GF (Ground Floor) alongwith parking No.P-GF was allotted. The total price of the unit was fixed as Rs.42,34,599.72. The Opposite Parties received more than Rs.12 lakhs after booking and before entering into Agreement from the previous allottees. Thereafter, the complainant entered into an Agreement with the previous allottee on 07.10.2018 of the unit, in dispute and paid all the amounts. The complainant submitted all the documents for transfer of the said unit but the Opposite Parties had not mentioned the transfer charges/fee anywhere in Agreement. It was stated that when the complainant submitted the documents for transfer, the Opposite Parties refused to transfer the same, till the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top