SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI, PADMA PANDEY, RAJESH K.ARYA
Shamsher Singh Dinarpur – Appellant
Versus
Emerging India Housing Corporation Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
Argued by (through Video Conferencing)
For the complainant:Sh. Naveen Sheokand, Advocate
For the Opposite Parties:Sh. J.S.Rattu, Advocate.
For the complainants: None.
For the Opposite Parties:Sh. J.S.Rattu, Advocate
Argued by (through Video Conferencing):
None for the complainant.
Sh. J.S.Rattu, Advocate for the Opposite Parties.
Argued by (through Video Conferencing):
Sh.Rajesh Verma, Advocate for the complainant.
Sh. J.S.Rattu, Advocate for the Opposite Parties.
Argued by (through Video Conferencing):
Sh. Manav Parteek, Advocate for the complainant.
Sh. J.S.Rattu, Advocate for Opposite Parties.
Argued by (through Video Conferencing):
None for the complainant.
Sh. J.S.Rattu, Advocate for Opposite Parties.

ORDER

Padma Pandey, Member—By this order, we propose to dispose of the aforesaid seven consumer complaints bearing Nos.181/2019, 27/2020, 60/2020, 107/2020, 113/2020 (five refund cases) and 18/2020 & 58/2020 (two possession cases). Since, the facts involved in the above complaints, except minor variations, here and there, of law and facts are the same, therefore, we are of the opinion that these complaints can be disposed of, by passing a consolidated order.

Under above circumstances, to dictate order, facts are being taken from consumer complaint bearing No.181 of 2019 titled as Shamsher Singh Dinarpur Vs. Emerging India Housing Corporation Pvt. Ltd.

2. The facts in brief are that the complainant booked a flat in the project of the Opposite Parties “Emerging Heights” on 03.04.2014, in which flat No.E-501 in EH-III was allotted to the complainant vide allotment letter dated 18.09.2014. The total price of the unit was fixed as Rs.30,60,000/-, out of which, the complainant paid the amount of Rs.6,15,000/- vide receipts (Annexure C-2). The Opposite Parties also issued Offer Letter dated 16.09.2014 to the complainant. It was stated that the Opposite Parties assured the complainant to de

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top