SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, ANIL SRIVASTAVA
K. N. Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant: None
For the Opp. Parties: None

JUDGMENT

Dr. Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, President.—The present complaint being filed under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by Mr. K. N Gupta (hereinafter referred to as ‘complainant’) against Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. & Anr. (hereinafter referred to as ‘opposite parties’) and has prayed the following reliefs.

a) Pass an order against OP no 1 to refund amount of Rs. 8,57,922=00 to the complainant.

b) Pass an order against OP no 1 to pay pendent elite and future interest @ 20% p.a. till date of full and final payment.

c) Pass an order against OP no 1 to pay Rs. 30,60,000=00 for the delay in construction of the flat/project and for covering up the difference in cost for enabling the complainant to purchase a similar flat admeasuring 1800 sq ft. in the same vicinity as on the date of filing this complaint.

d) Pass an order against OP no 1 to pay an amount of Rs. 10.00 Lacs to the complainant towards deficiency in service including the mental agony and harassment caused to the complainant.

e) Pass any other or further order; which this Hon’ble Commission may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.

Facts of the case

2. Brief facts necessary for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top