Sanjeev Ginotra VS Ansal Hi-Tech Township Ltd.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, ANIL SRIVASTAVA
Sanjeev Ginotra – Appellant
Versus
Ansal Hi-Tech Township Ltd. – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant: None
For the Opp. Party: None

JUDGMENT

Dr. Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, President.—Brief facts necessary for the adjudication of the present complaint are that on 22.07.2008, Complainant booked a plot in the project of the Opposite Party by the name and style of “Megapolis” located at Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh and paid a registration advance of Rs. 6,88,640/- drawn on ICICI Bank, which was duly acknowledged by the Opposite party vide receipts no. 558 and 559.

2. Vide letter dated 09.08.2008, the Complainant was allotted Plot bearing no. 059 admeasuring 450 sq. Mtrs for a basic sale price of Rs. 68, 86, 400/-. Thereafter, a Plot Allottee(s) Arrangement was entered between the parties on 22.07.2008 with respect to the aforesaid booking. The Plot Allottee(s) Arrangement provided for the Payment plan which has been reproduced below for ready reference:-

S. No.	Stage (Due Date)	% of Basic Sale Price	Amount Due
1.	At The Time of Booking	10.00 % of Basic	Rs. 6, 88, 640.00/-
2.	45 Day(s) From The Date of Booking	10.00 % of Basic	Rs. 6, 88, 640.00/-
3.	90 Day(s) From The Date of Boo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, ANIL SRIVASTAVASanjeev Ginotra – AppellantVersusAnsal Hi-Tech Township Ltd. – Respondent

Cases Referred (2)

SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, ANIL SRIVASTAVA
Sanjeev Ginotra – Appellant
Versus
Ansal Hi-Tech Township Ltd. – Respondent