SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PUKHRAJ R.BORA, D.R.SHIRASAO
Manager, Bank of India – Appellant
Versus
Ravindra Maruti Mote – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Anant B. Shinde, Advocate
For the Respondent: In person

ORDER

Pukhraj R. Bora, President.—Being aggrieved by the Judgment and Order passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Alibaug-Raigad in consumer complaint No.CC/273/2018 on 29/10/2018, opponent therein has preferred the present appeal.

Facts of the case

2. Respondent/complainant had filed aforesaid consumer complaint alleging deficiency in service on the part of the appellant Bank on the ground that it had illegally and unauthorizedly deducted amount of Rs. 2005 as TDS from the amount of interest payable to him on his F.D.R. made in the appellant bank. As is revealing from the record, Respondent/complainant had invested an amount of Rs.35,000/- with the appellant bank by way of F.D.R. The amount was deposited on 15/12/2012 and was liable to mature on 15/12/2017. Maturity amount was stated to be Rs.54,617.82. In the consumer complaint before the District Commission it was alleged by the complainant that though against the F.D.R. amount he was entitled for claiming loan, the same was illegally refused to him. It was his further allegation that though no TDS w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top