DINESH SINGH
Taken up through video conferencing Haryana Roadways Through Its General Manager – Appellant
Versus
Manjinder Singh Saini – Respondent
ORDER
Dinesh Singh, Presiding Member.—This Petition has been filed under Section 21(b) of The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (the ‘Act 1986’) [corresponding Section 58(1)(b) of The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (the ‘Act 2019’)] in challenge to the Order dated 15.01.2020 of The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, U. T. Chandigarh (the ‘State Commission’) in F.A. No. 176 of 2019 arising out of the Order dated 28.06.2019 in C.C. No. 541 of 2018 of The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T. Chandigarh (the ‘District Commission’).
The Petitioners, Haryana Roadways, were the Opposite Parties before the District Commission (the ‘Roadways’).
The Respondent, Mr. Manjinder Singh Saini, was the Complainant before the District Commission (the ‘Complainant’).
2. Arguments heard from the learned Counsel for the Roadways.
Perused the material on record, including inter alia the Order dated 28.06.2019 of the District Commission, the impugned Order dated 15.01.2020 of the State Commission and the Petition.
3. The Petition has been filed with self-admitted delay of 246 days. Notwithstanding the Covid-19 situation mentioned insipidly in para 6 of the application for condonation
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.