SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DEEPA SHARMA
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner – Appellant
Versus
Sakhi Das Naranabhai Patel – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. R.R. Rajesh, Advocate
For the Respondents: In person

ORDER

Deepa Sharma, Presiding Member.—Vide the present revision petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 14.11.2017 of the State Commission in Appeal no.3583 of 2012 which had been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 28.08.2012 of the District Forum in Complaint No.378 of 2010.

2. Brief facts of the case are that respondent was working with the Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation and he had worked for a period from 16.01.1971 to 30.04.2005, on which date, he retired. He was a member of Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provision Act, 1952 and when it was substituted by Employees Pension Scheme, 1995, he became member of Employees Pension Scheme, 1995. His account number was G.J.1122/A/22117. He was aggrieved by the fact that petitioner who was the opposite party before the District Forum in his complaint, had fixed his pension at Rs.1256/- while he was entitled for the pension at Rs.1436/- per month in terms of Section 12 (4) of the Employees State Pension Scheme, 1995 which was applicable to him. When his request for recalculation of his pension was not heeded, he filed complaint. All the other contentions in the complaint except the entitl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top