SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
R.K. Agrawal, President, Dr. S.M. Kantikar, Member and Binoy Kumar, Member
M/s. Bommidala Purnaiah Holdings (P) Ltd. – Complainant
versus
New India Assurance Company Ltd. – Opp. Party
Consumer Case No.715 of 2015
Decided on 27.9.2021

Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. Nitesh Rana, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:Mr. Navdeep Singh and Mr. Anurag Dhar Dubey, Advocates

IMPORTANT POINTS
1. Insurance claim cannot be inordinately delayed.
2. Delay will result in payment of interest to ensured.
3. Random inspections and obsequious objections cannot be grounds to hold up claims

Headnote:

Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Section 21[Consumer Protection Act, 2019 -Section 58(1)]– Pecuniary jurisdiction of NCDRC in matters amounting Rs. 1 crore and above – Complainant had insured goods under the OP insurance company – Goods were destroyed in a fire – Complainant repeatedly made claim for insurance settlement – Assessment made by both state authorities and FSL lab – No extraneous substance found – Claim not given – Complaint made - OP sent second surveyor – Second surveyor also didn’t find any extra substances – Report held not admissible – Claim held to be valid - NCDRC downgraded interest to 12% from 18% claimed by Complainant. (Paras 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 13, 22, 23, 24, 25 &26)

Result: Complainant awarded insurance claim with interest.

ORDER

R.K. Agrawal, President.—M/s. Bommidala Purnaiah Holdings Pvt. Ltd. through its Director and M/s. Tobacco Enterprises of India through its Managing Partner (hereinafter referred to as the Complainant) have filed Consumer Complaint Nos. 715 of 2015 and 716 of 216 respectively, under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”) against The New India Assurance Company Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Opposite Party Insurance Company’).

2. Since the material facts and issue involved in the both the cases are similar, we dispose of both these cases by this common Order. For the sake of convenience, the material facts as enumerated hereunder are taken from CC No. 715 of 2016 titled as “M/s. Bommidala Purnaiah Holdings (P) Ltd. vs. The New India Assurance Company Ltd.”

3. The Complainant, who is engaged in the business of tobacco trading and processing, stored its stock of tobacco in the godown of M/s Tobacco Enterprises of India. For covering the risk of its tobacco stock stored/lying in non-kutcha construction building situated in the premises of M/s. Tobacco Enterprises of India, the Complainant obtained two Standard Fire and Special Perils Policies, i.e., Policy No. 62100311120100000041 for the period of insurance from 09.04.2012, (03:04:29 pm) to 08.10.2012 (11:59:59 pm) for total sum insured of Rs.5,00,00,000/- (Rupees Five Crore only) and Policy No. 62100311120100000040 for the period of insurance from 09.04.2012, (12:14:45 pm) to 08.04.2013 (11:59:59 pm) for total sum insured of Rs.2,00,00,000/- (Rupees Two Crore only), from Opposite Party Insurance Company after paying premium of Rs.1,89,493/- (Rupees One Lac Eighty Nine Thousand Four Hundred Ninety-Three only) and Rs.1,33,737/- (Rupees One Lac Thirty Three Thousand Seven Hundred Thirty Seven only) respectively. Unfortunately, during the currency of the Policies, i.e., on 10.08.2012 around 2:00 AM fire accident took place in the premises of Tobacco Enterprises India Ltd. due to short circuit of electricity. The incident was reported to the Local Police, who registered a case bearing Cr. No. 357 of 2012.The Police immediately contacted Clue Team to visit the scene of fire incident and the Clue Team examined the fire accident site and seized partly burnt loose tobacco leaves and other materials and forwarded these items to the Director, Forensic Science Laboratories, Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as the FSL), for Analysis. The Police also informed the Station Fire Officer, Guntur, The Factories Department, Govt. of Andhra Pradesh and Electrical Inspectorate, Govt. of Andhra Pradesh, for visiting the fire spot and furnishing the report. The Complainant informed the Opposite Party Insurance Company about the Fire Incident and told that his stock of tobacco worth Rs.6,04,97,423/- stored in the godown had been totally damaged. The Opposite Party Insurance Company appointed Unik Insurance Surveyor and Loss Assessors (P) Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Surveyor) to assess the loss.

4. The Electrical Inspectorate, Govt. of Andhra Pradesh vide letter dated 18.08.2012 informed that “as per investigation it is found that on 09.08.2012 there was a heavy rain in the area and power failure several times. Due to fluctuations in the voltage, the insulation of the wires may be damaged and short circuit occurred. Due to short circuit the tobacco boxes and bundles stored in the godown caught fire. Hence it is confirmed that the fire accident occurred due to short circuit.”

5. The Factories Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh vide its report dated 09.08.2012 informed that “all the workers left the factory and godown were kept locked. Around 10:30 PM heavy wind and rainfall were there in that area and power failure occurred several times. On intervening night of 10.08.2012 at about 00:30 hrs. one security person noticed the fire at the godown no. 4 by that time fire sparked throughout the godown and all the stocks in the godown caught fire.”

6. T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top