SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DEEPA SHARMA, SUBHASH CHANDRA
Bhawar Lal – Appellant
Versus
General Manager, State Bank of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Ms. Tuhi Singh, Advocate

ORDER (ORAL)

The present Revision Petition, under Section 58 (1) (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (for short “the Act”) has been filed by the Complainant against the order dated 18.03.2020 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajasthan Circuit Bench, Udaipur (for short “the State Commission”) in Appeal No.297 of 2013 of the Petitioner which was filed against the order dated 30.10.2013 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-Chittorgarh, Rajasthan (for short “the District Forum”) in his Complaint No.368 of 2012. The Complaint was dismissed by the District Forum. The State Commission vide the impugned order, while dismissing the Appeal, imposed cost of Rs.10,000/-.

2. The Petitioner had filed the Complaint before the District Forum claiming deficiency in service on the part of the Respondent/Opposite Party whereby they had refused to encash the FD which, the Petitioner alleged, had been opened by him by depositing a cash amount of Rs.47,000/- but the same had not been encashed by the Opposite Party while another FD for the same amount which was opened on 04.12.2006 had been encashed.

3. The plea of the Opposite Party/Respondent had been that the Comp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top