SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.K.AGRAWAL, S.M.KANTIKAR
Jacob Thomas Kadakampallil – Appellant
Versus
Sahara Prime City Ltd. – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainants:Mr. Arun Francis, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:Ms. Neha Gupta and Ms. Rhea Dube, Advocates

ORDER

R.K. Agrawal, President.—The present Consumer Complaint has been filed under Sections 21, read with Section 12(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”) by the Complainants, in the representative capacity, agitating their joint, personal as well as collective grievance against the Opposite Party, M/s. Sahara Prime City Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Builder’) for the inordinate delay in handing over possession of the Flats booked by them in the Project launched by the Builder in the name and style of “Sahara Grace Kochi” in the year 2007 in Ernakulam, Kerala.

2. Initially, the Complaint Nos. 969 and 970 of 2016 were filed by the four Complainants combined together in each of the cases. Thereafter, I.A. No. 5330 of 2016 was filed on behalf of the Complainants U/S 12 (1) (c) of the Act seeking permission to file the Complaint on behalf of eights Complainants and also on behalf of several other similarly situated Consumers. Vide Order dated 16.05.2017, the said Application was allowed and permission was granted to treat the Complaint as a Joint

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top