SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

C.VISWANATH, RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA
Kartar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Grover Motors Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner: In person

ORDER

1. Heard Mr. Kartar Singh, In person, the petitioner.

2. This revision has been filed against the order of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab at Chandigarh, dated 15.04.2021, passed in Appeal No. 216 of 2019 (arising out of the order of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Fatehgarh Sahib, dated 11.03.2019, passed in Consumer Complaint No. 59 of 2017), whereby the complaint was partly allowed and the opposite parties were directed to remove the defects in the vehicle, particularly to change the required parts and tyres of the vehicle, charging 25% of the cost of the tyres from the petitioner and to pay Rs.200000/- for mental agony and harassment and Rs.15000/- as cost of the litigation and the appeal of the petitioner was dismissed.

3. Kartar Singh (the petitioner) filed Consumer Complaint No. 59 of 2017, for directing the respondents to pay Rs. 8 lakhs as the damages for the loss suffered by him and the damages at the rate of Rs.10000/- per day, from the date of filing of the complaint till handing over the possession of the vehicle after removal of the defects in it and exchange of new tyres; in alternative the opposite parties be directed to change

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top