SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C.VISWANATH, RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA
Shivalik Vihar Sites Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Jasbir Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mr. Shreenath A. Khemka, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Neeraj Pal Sharma, Advocate

ORDER

1. Heard Mr. Shreenath A. Khemka, Advocate, for the petitioners and Mr. Neeraj Pal Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.

2. Review Application No. 126 of 2020, filed for review/recall of the order dated 17.06.2020, passed in this revision, was listed on 27.09.2021. As the arguments in review application and in the revision are same, we asked the counsel for the parties to argue the revision on merit, so that the controversy be decided finally.

3. This revision has been filed against the order of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab at Chandigarh, dated 04.11.2010, passed in Appeal No. 14 of 2009 (arising out of the order of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-1, U.T. Chandigarh, dated 08.12.2008, passed in Consumer Complaint No. 663 of 2008) whereby the complaint was dismissed and the appeal was allowed and the petitioners were directed to refund the amount of Rs. 11 lakhs with interest @ 6% per annum to the respondent, within 30 days. After 30 days, the interest was enhanced @ 12% per annum.

4. Jasbir Singh (respondent-1) (since deceased and now represented by respondents-2 to 5, his heirs) filed Consumer Complaint No. 663 of 2008, for directing the p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top