SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DINESH SINGH, KARUNA NAND BAJPAYEE
Taken up through video conferencing Rajasthan Housing Board – Appellant
Versus
Leena Bhatia – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. N.K. Chauhan, Advocate

ORDER

This petition has been filed under Section 21(b) of The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (the ‘Act 1986’) in challenge to the Order dated 19.07.2019 of The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajasthan (the ‘State Commission’) in appeal no. 566 of 2019 arising out of the Order dated 19.03.2019 of The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jaipur-III (the ‘District Commission’) in complaint no. 1623 of 2012.

2. Heard the learned counsel at admission. Perused the material on record, including inter alia the Order dated 19.03.2019 of the District Commission, the impugned Order dated 19.07.2019 of the State Commission and the petition.

3. The facts of the case, succinctly put, are that the complainant registered with the petitioner housing board for a residential flat under a self-financing scheme on payment of an amount of Rs. 60,000/-. The tentative costing of the flat in question, initially indicated at the time of advertising the scheme, was subsequently revised upwards. Aggrieved with the escalation in the cost, the complainant made correspondence with the housing board and inter alia sent a legal notice, asking that the cost be kept as initially advertised.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top