RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA
Nakoda Machinery Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
John Crasta – Respondent
ORDER
Ram Surat Ram Maurya, Presiding Member.—Heard Mr. Vijay Kumar Pandey, Advocate, for the petitioner and Mr. Manu Krishnan, Advocate, for respondent-1, through video conferencing. None appeared for respondent-2.
2. This revision has been filed against the order of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kerala dated 18.08.2015, passed in First Appeal No. 35 of 2014 (arising out of order of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kasaragod dated 29.11.2013, passed in Consumer Complaint No. 26 of 2012), whereby the complaint was allowed and the petitioner was directed to replace Rock Breaker with a new one or refund Rs.6,25,000/-, pay Rs.1,00,000/- for physical and mental harassment and Rs.3000/- as the cost of litigation and the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed.
3. The office has submitted report that the revision has been filed with delay of 400 days. The petitioner has filed an application for condonation of delay (I.A. No. 12640 of 2016), in which, it has been stated that State Commission, after hearing the arguments, in the appeal, reserved the judgment. The counsel for the petitioner told that after delivery of judgment, a certified copy of the sa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.