RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA
Giridhar Sampat Lanjewar – Appellant
Versus
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER
Ram Surat Ram Maurya, Presiding Member.—Heard Mr. Madhurendra Kumar, Advocate, for the appellant and Mr. R.B. Shami, Advocate, for the respondents.
2. This appeal has been filed against the order of State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Maharashtra, dated 19.12.2012, passed in Consumer Complaint No. 172 of 2001, partly allowing the complaint for Rs.90,577/- for loss/damages, Rs.5000/- for the harassment and Rs.1000/- as the cost.
3. Giridhar Sampat Lanjewar (the Insured) filed Consumer Complaint No. 172 of 2001, for insurance claim of Rs.10,22,202/- (i.e. Rs.56350/- for damage of the building, Rs.92200/- for damage of plant and machineries, Rs.870152/- for damages for stock of the grains and rice and Rs.3500/- other expenses), cost of the litigation and any other relief, for which he was entitled. It has been stated in the complaint that the Insured was carrying on the business of rice milling, in the name of Santosh Rice Mill at Tumsar, district Bhandara. The Insured was granted financial assistance by Bhandara Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. due to which, he had to submit Stock Statement to the Bank in every month, which used to verify it. The Insured obtained an Insura
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.