SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.K.AGRAWAL, S.M.KANTIKAR
Sivarama Sarma Jonnalagadda – Appellant
Versus
Maruthi Corporation Limited – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainants:Ms. Vaishnavi, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. B.K.V. Subrahmanyam, Advocate

ORDER

R.K. Agrawal, President.—The present Consumer Complaints have been filed under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”) by Allottees /Complainants against Opposite Parties, M/s. Maruthi Corporation Ltd., having been allotted Units/Villas in the project “Green Fields” proposed to be developed by Opposite Partiesat Chattana Palli Village Shadnagar Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District. Alleging deficiency in service, the Complainants are before this Commission seeking refund of amount paid towards purchase of Units alongwith interest and costs.

2. Since the facts involved in these Complaints are similar except for minor variations in the Unit numbers and their sale consideration, these Complaints are being disposed off by this common Order. However, for the sake of convenience, facts as enumerated in Consumer Complaint No. 379 of 2013 have been discussed at length herein.

3. The Complainants are Indian Origin naturalized U.S. citizens and are resident in United States of America. The Complainants allege that Opposite Party No. 2/Managing Director of Opposite Party No. 1 had approached and offered to sell them Villa in project “Green Fields” which was suppo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top