SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C.VISWANATH
Lokesh Kapoor – Appellant
Versus
National Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Arjun Jain and Ms. Anushree Narain, Advocates
For the Respondents:Ms. Philomina Thomas, Advocate

ORDER

C. Viswanath, Presiding Member.—The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner against order dated 07.08.2014 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Himachal Pradesh (for short “State Commission”) in First Appeal No. 185 of 2014.

2. Along with the Revision Petition, IA/852/2014, an application for condonation of delay of 70 days has also been filed by the Petitioner. However, as per computation done by the Registry, there is a delay of 30 days. For the reasons mentioned in the application and in the interest of justice, IA/852/2014 is allowed and delay condoned.

3. The case of the Complainant/ Petitioner is that he purchased an Indigo CS-LS TDI car, bearing Chassis No. MAT607146CWE31049 and Engine No.475IDT14EXYP35248, on 22.10.2012 for a consideration of Rs.5,44,111/- from Hi-Tech Satluj Motors Pvt. Ltd., NH-21, Lunapani, Distt. Mandi, Himachal Pradesh. The vehicle was allotted temporary number HP-33A-9299 which was insured with the Opposite Party, vide Policy No.25331031126120065990, for Rs.5,16,905/- by paying premium of Rs.18,814/- on 22.10.2012 and valid from 22.10.2012 to 21.10.2013. On 31.10.2012, the Complainant had gone to the ele

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top