SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DEEPA SHARMA, SUBHASH CHANDRA
Aloke Anand – Appellant
Versus
IREO Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. Nithin Chandran, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari, Advocate

ORDER

Deepa Sharma, Presiding Member.—The brief facts of the case are that complainant had booked an apartment bearing unit no. SY-B-32-03 in the project ‘SKYON’ of the opposite party situated at Golf Course Extension Road, Sector 60, Gurugram and made initial payment of Rs.15,00,000/- and an allotment letter dated 14.01.2011 was issued in his favour. A Builder Buyer Agreement was executed on 14.02.2012 and the total consideration amount of the subject flat was Rs. 2,39,89,784/-. Complainant had paid total sum of Rs.2,23,91,480/- on several dates. Certain additional charges were also raised from the complainant. It is submitted that due date of delivery of possession was 42 months with grace period of six months from the date of approval of the building plan. The delivery of the subject flat was not made within the stipulated period. Aggrieved, the complainant has filed the present complaint and has prayed that opposite party be directed to hand over the subject property alongwith delayed compensation containing all the facilities as promised under the Builder Buyer Agreement. In case the opposite party fails to deliver the possession, the direction to refund the principal amount o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top